After the FBI made an announcement via a letter sent to Congress last Friday about a “new emails that appear to be pertinent” regarding Hilary Clinton’s private server investigation that the FBI had refused to recommend charges against Clinton for back in July, we’ve seen not only an implosion of the Clinton campaign, but also panic from the media to the elite globalists, as well as the political establishment.

The new information were obtained from Anthony Weiner’s computer, who is a former disgraced Congressman and husband of Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin.

Before we go into detail about the overwhelming amount of information that has been revealed since Comey’s letter to Congress was reported on October 28, 2016, it’s good to mention that officials have been aware for months that Abedin had forwarded work-related and classified State Department emails to herself at an unsecured account using the email address

Jerome Corsi was the first one to report on this in late August at WND:

“Even more potentially damaging, of the 110 emails Abedin forwarded to her personal email servers, 45 were found by WND to have contained heavily redacted information, with some 20 of the emails 100 percent redacted. Many have a bold “PAGE DENIED” stamped on the page. 

In other words, almost half of the emails that Abedin forwarded to her unsecured personal account have information the State Department deems too sensitive to be seen by members of Congress or the American people.

While the investigation was ongoing, the Clinton team handed over around 55,000 pages of emails, while deleting an additional 33,000, claiming they were “not work related,” and asserting that everything pertinent was turned over.

Last week it’s been reported that a great number of the emails found on Weiner’s computer that Abedin forwarded to herself, were work-related emails that were never turned over to FBI investigators by Hillary Clinton. This highly suggests that the emails that were deleted on purpose were deliberately kept from the FBI to prevent charges from being recommended against Clinton.

Moreover, when WikiLeaks went public about Clinton’s private server, her campaign chair John Podesta, stated on March 2, 2015, “We are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later.”

Even though Clinton’s team claims that Podesta was actually talking about dumping the emails to the public, another emails released by Wikileaks on November 3, 2016, suggests that the Clinton campaign internally acknowledged that there were emails that would not be turned over.




During the last week we also witnessed how Obama administration repeatedly attempted to kill the investigation into the Clinton Foundation, according to Daily Caller:

Senior-level Justice Department officials pushed back heavily on an ongoing FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation, according to a bombshell report from The Wall Street Journal.

The newspaper laid out numerous examples, based on law enforcement sources, of senior DOJ officials intervening to quash the probe.

There are many examples indicating that Obama’s DOJ was obstructing the investigation on purpose.

The DOJ was also strongly against James Comey notifying Congress about the news emails found to be pertinent to the Clinton server investigation. The reports suggest that the DOJ justified their opposition as by citing “policy” of not revealing information that could affect an election, or in other words, it was all to protect Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.

Furthermore, a new scandal erupted when it was discovered that many dead people decided to vote for Hillary. These kinds of irregularities were noticed in multiple states.  In one case a stack of over 80 ballots, all listing different names, but the same address (a two bedroom apartment) being discovered and major media networks have been busted creating graphics that declare Hillary Clinton the winner of an election that is still five days away.



Barack Obama has been quoted, more than once, as stating “Trump won’t be elected president,” and he’s also claimed many times that he has faith in the American people not to vote for Trump.

After all, it is normal to ask ourselves ‘how far will Obama go, only and only to prevent Trump from winning’.

There have been many disturbing occurrences where anonymous sources within U.S. intelligence agencies all of a sudden started leaking information about possible al-Qaeda terror attacks, specifically mentioning Monday, the day before the presidential election is to occur.

According to CBS News, this follows warnings from earlier in the week about “polling places” being seen as “attractive targets” for lone wolf”-type attacks by individuals motivated by violent extremist ideologies, sovereign citizen or other extremist activity.”

Talking about coincidence… The same week that Clinton’s scandal was revealed, the public was told about a major terror attack that may occur in multiple states the day before the election.

Now, another question arises: Could the elections be suspended?

The answer is yes, the election technically can be suspended by Obama.The office of president has been given, by Congress, extraordinary emergency powers, over the past decades. For instance, 2006 Bush signed the John Warner Defense Authorization Act into law, which would allow the sitting president to declare a “public emergency” at his discretion.

Via UFP News:

On October 17, 2006, President Bush signed into law, the John Warner Defense Authorization Act, which affords the president (any president) the ability to declare a ‘public emergency’ at his own discretion, and place federal troops anywhere throughout the United States. Under this law, the president also now has the authority to federalize National Guard troops without the consent of state governors, in order to restore ‘public order.’ The President can now deploy federal troops to U.S. cities, at will, which eliminates the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act.

Via Michael Snyder in August 2016:

There is not a single statute, regulation, executive order or presidential directive that contains all of the powers that a president would possess during a major national emergency. Rather, these powers have been layered on top of one another for a very long period of time, and they come from literally dozens of different laws, regulations, court decisions, executive orders and presidential directives.

One document that I would refer you to is National Security Presidential Directive 51 which was put into effect during the Bush administration. It is all about “national continuity policy” and it defines a “catastrophic emergency” as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions”.

In such a scenario, the president would have almost unlimited power, and he would wield enormously powerful executive orders such as this one. If there was a big enough emergency, the president would potentially be able to declare martial law, suspend elections and essentially become a dictator.

In such a scenario, the president would have almost unlimited power, and he would wield enormously powerful executive orders such as this one. If there was a big enough emergency, the president would potentially be able to declare martial law, suspend elections and essentially become a dictator.


Technically the president has the power to suspend the elections by declaring a national emergency or martial law, but we highly doubt that the American nation will tolerate that just so he could prevent a candidate from winning the election. Given this, he will need a little help from his fellow terrorist and direct series of “terrorist attacks”.

The presidential race is extremely tight, and no one can predict the polls. But then again, desperate times call for desperate measures. How desperate Obama and Clinton are, we will see at the end of the elections.