According to a new Wikileaks leak, during her time as a Secretary of State, Clinton instructed the war in Syria in order to overthrow the government of President Assad, because it is “best way to help Israel”.

As reported by

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

There is a mistake in the Wikileaks transcript because it dates the email as December 31, 2000, when in fact the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) dates from December 31, 2012.

In the email, it is clearly stated that the US has been greatly involved in the violent overthrow of the Syrian government, and it was done in Israel’s interests.

The email starts with Hilary stating that “The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.”

Clinton won’t stop lying in order “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel, despite the fact that all US intelligence reports had dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax. This was supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

According to her, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East. She also declared that if Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, it would Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.

That’s why according to Clinton, Syria has to be destroyed.

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.

If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

She continues by saying that it is the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.

Hilary Clinton admits that it would not come about through a “direct attack,” because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”

The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.

Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.

She also claimed that a direct threat to Assad and his family with violence is the “right thing” to do:

In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

This email is a solid proof that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.

Given this, the “refugee crisis” that threatens to destroy Europe, is a direct consequence of Hilary’s and the government’s lunatic ideas.

Moreover – thanks to Hilary and Obama – over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq.

This woman is a presidential candidate – someone whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people.

Let’s not forget that she also declared that if elected, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level”, so you can only imagine what that would mean.